Writing Near-History
When my novel, The Lotus Eaters, first came out, a reviewer identified it as the Vietnam novel with the bibliography at the back. Forty years after the fall of Saigon, it is still a bit of a shock to consider a period that so many remember as their youth now referred to as history. I was a young child at the end of the sixties, living on a military base. Although I certainly didn’t understand the war, it became an obsession into my adult life. I do not at all consider myself a historical writer, so when the idea first came to me to write about the war from the perspective of a female combat photojournalist, the prospect was terrifying. I tried to push the idea away. There are masterful accounts of the war by soldiers. In my opinion, no one will ever come close to Tim O’Brien’s books on the war. But the story that kept nagging at me was a very different one — one that almost required the kind of distance from the events that I had.
When I finally decided to go ahead with the project, I tried to be very clear in my goals. I felt an enormous obligation to get the facts right, and beyond that, to get the intangibles of the time correct. Otherwise, that precious “suspension of disbelief” would not happen for the many readers who had their own experiences to compare with. There was also the need to show the truth of the war to those with no experience of it, those not even born yet. Not only the American military side of the war, but the war from the perspective of the Vietnamese. What was the country like before Americans came? An additional question was how do journalists deal with war coverage compared to the soldiers fighting the war. It probably won’t be surprising to learn that I spent more than a year and a half digging into all these areas.
In any war novel, the war itself becomes a character, an active force in the lives of the people who must live and struggle through it. We all know how the war ended — the indelible images of the helicopters withdrawing Americans from rooftops in Saigon — and I felt that it would be coy to not acknowledge that end. This is a storyteller’s decision, not a historian’s. My focus was not on what happened, but why. The question became how to reconcile that ending with the casual beginnings in the late 50’s, early 60’s, when no one could imagine what the war would turn into. It required a diving into research, putting myself in the mindset of my characters during that time, sure that there was no other possible outcome than American victory.
That year-plus of research was spent with non-fiction accounts of the war by historians, soldiers, and journalists. I read extensively about the history of colonialism in Vietnam. Almost a hundred years of French domination that the Vietnamese finally threw off. Would they likely accept Americans or trust our motives? I read first-hand accounts by Vietnamese workers (read slaves) who worked at the Michelin rubber plantation under the French and suffered horrific abuse and exploitation. Those are the people whose descendants were able to live for months at a time underground, in the tunnels of Chu Chi.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2472/f2472b9e39c343226cacad33388f8f6b7284737b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4b73/a4b73a3e42732ce76e73db32bf6e7eb58b1d52b0" alt=""
Everything I’ve described so far was only the first step of the process. Research, as involving and illuminating as it is, does not make a book. It is merely the foundation. Now I had to actually write a story to go inside this world.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/251b4/251b4f942345d5f8b02f12fd9297f8ff3ca34642" alt=""
A review of her debut novel The Lotus Eaters can be found on In The Next Room here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments make my day!